| Author |  | 
      
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          I think I captured the strangeness!!
           | Posted: March 13 2006 at 22:10 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I dimmed a lamp (01.24.B3) to 140 (8Ch), then it popped up to ~100% (FEh?) on its own, and then I brought it back to 122 (7Ah)...
 
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 FF
 3/13/2006 9:05:17 PM:ackmsg=01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 FF
 PLC:srq:SRIR=04,01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 FF
 PLC:eventraw=03
 ui:srq:srir=00 00 00 01 7A 9F 0F 19 00
 si:00 D4 2C 01 7A 9F 0F 19 00
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 7A 9F 00 D4 2C 2F 00 00
 3/13/2006 9:05:32 PM:ackmsg=01 7A 9F 00 D4 2C 2F 00 00
 PLC:srq:SRIR=04,01 7A 9F 00 D4 2C 2F 00 00
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=03
 ui:srir=00 00 00 01 24 B3 0F 11 8C
 si:00 D4 2C 01 24 B3 0F 11 8C
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 24 B3 00 D4 2C AF 11 FE
 3/13/2006 9:05:38 PM:ackmsg=01.24.B3:ON at OUT
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:SRIR=03,01 24 B3 00 D4 2C AF 11 FE
 ui:srir=00 00 00 01 24 B3 0F 11 7A
 si:00 D4 2C 01 24 B3 0F 11 7A
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 11 7A
 3/13/2006 9:05:43 PM:ackmsg=01.24.B3:ON at 48%
 PLC:SRIR=04,01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 11 7A
 PLC:eventraw=03
 ui:srq:srir=00 00 00 01 7A 7E 0F 19 00
 si:00 D4 2C 01 7A 7E 0F 19 00
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 7A 7E 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7B
 3/13/2006 9:05:47 PM:ackmsg=01 7A 7E 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7B
 PLC:srq:SRIR=04,01 7A 7E 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7B
 PLC:eventraw=03
 ui:srq:srir=00 00 00 01 24 B3 0F 19 00
 si:00 D4 2C 01 24 B3 0F 19 00
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7A
 3/13/2006 9:06:03 PM:ackmsg=01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7A
 PLC:srq:SRIR=04,01 24 B3 00 D4 2C 2F 00 7A
 PLC:eventraw=03
 ui:srq:srir=00 00 00 01 7A 9F 0F 19 00
 si:00 D4 2C 01 7A 9F 0F 19 00
 
 Edited by TonyNo
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dhoward Admin Group
 
  
  
 Joined: June 29 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 4447
 | 
          Tony,
           | Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:08 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 Yep...I see it.  It can all be summed up in this one log block:
 
 ui:srir=00 00 00 01 24 B3 0F 11 8C
 si:00 D4 2C 01 24 B3 0F 11 8C
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=04
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=04 01 24 B3 00 D4 2C AF 11 FE
 3/13/2006 9:05:38 PM:ackmsg=01.24.B3:ON at OUT
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:SRIR=03,01 24 B3 00 D4 2C AF 11 FE
 
 You can see where the ON command at level 8C is sent to the SDM.  The very next line shows the SDM sending the command out at the same level.  Then, BOOM, the acknowledgement comes back with the level at FE (254) or full on.  The last line shows that this acknowledgment is used as the return for the SRIR command.
 
 It's looks as if either the command was "misinterpreted" by the device or the device is defective.  Since you say the device initially went to 50% and then "popped" to 100%, it sounds as if the device might be defective.  That or the command was received properly and then a "reflection" was misinterpreted.  Reflections and problems such as this may be caused by borderline communications.  Im not sure.
 
 In any event, I would definately post at least the SDM blurb I posted above on either the SmartLabs forum or CT since SmartLabs people hang out there and see what they say.  Definately wierd though.
 
 Dave.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Thanks Dave! I'll do that tomorrow; I'm on the road now using my
           | Posted: March 14 2006 at 18:12 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 
 Edited by TonyNo
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Heh! I was trying to use my PPC, but think something went wrong!
           | Posted: March 15 2006 at 17:11 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |    
 Posted on CT. Now, we wait!
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Well, I swapped a new LampLinc in to that location and it was just at 50% and jumped up to 100%...
           | Posted: March 15 2006 at 21:58 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |    
 What are the chances of TWO bad modules?
  Not much, I think... | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dhoward Admin Group
 
  
  
 Joined: June 29 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 4447
 | 
          Tony,
           | Posted: March 15 2006 at 23:05 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I would bet money you dont have two bad modules.
 
 My guess is the physical location or perhaps the actual load plugged into the LampLinc.
 
 I would try a different lamp (perhaps something unique with the lamp...it's not a touch lamp is it?).  If that doesnt solve anything, then I would try a different location to try and eliminate a communication problem.
 
 Let me know what you find out.
 
 Dave.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          The lamp is one of those halogen torches.
           | Posted: March 16 2006 at 06:04 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I'll next try the module on an incancdescent lamp.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | Dean Senior Member
 
  
  
 Joined: August 21 2003
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 109
 | 
          Is Insteon supposed to work with all the new power-saving/energy efficient light bulbs?  I think most of these bulbs are fluorescent.  I believe X10 does not work with these bulbs, only with incandescent bulbs.
           | Posted: March 16 2006 at 09:25 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 -Dean
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dhoward Admin Group
 
  
  
 Joined: June 29 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 4447
 | 
          It should work with an appliance type module.  I don't know what would happen though if using one of those newer lamp flourescent bulbs with a dimmer type switch.
           | Posted: March 16 2006 at 23:31 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 Dave.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | QuickCarl Groupie
 
  
  
 Joined: February 13 2006
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 60
 | 
          I have some florescent energy saving bulbs in a fixture that is controlled by a dimmer, it will turn on in 'increments' of about 33% until full power if you try to Dim On...
           | Posted: March 19 2006 at 09:31 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I beleive that this is caused by the bulb, which isn't dimmable.  changing to incandescent will eliminate the problem.
 
 Not sure how the behavior shows up in the SDM and what communications are generated... haven't looked.  Just decided that "fast on" was the way to go.
   | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          I moved an incandescent lamp over to the problem module. We'll see what happens...
           | Posted: March 26 2006 at 13:53 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Dave,
           | Posted: March 26 2006 at 20:07 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I think you forgot about me...
 
 
 
| Quote: 
 
    
    | 
      
       | Is 01.7A.7E the address of the switch? Is 00.D4.2C the address of your PLC? If so, I'll check this out in the Insteon code and try to locate the problem for you. |  |  |  Still no Insteon events coming into PH when I use the Icon dimmers.
 
 Here is data from the SDM when switching off then on...
 
 PLC:eventraw=02
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=02 01 7A 7E 00 00 01 CF 13 00
 PLC:eventraw=01
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=01 01 7A 7E 00 D4 2C 45 13 01
 PLC:eventraw=03
 PLC:eventraw=02
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=02 01 7A 7E 00 00 01 CF 11 00
 PLC:eventraw=01
 PLC:receiveinsteonraw=01 01 7A 7E 00 D4 2C 45 11 01
 PLC:eventraw=03
 
 
 Edited by TonyNo - March 26 2006 at 20:10
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          No jumping dim level yet!
           | Posted: March 27 2006 at 22:27 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          1. We figured out that Insteon logging must be enabled for Insteon triggers to work.
           | Posted: April 03 2006 at 19:49 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 2. I put the halogen lamp back in and jumping dim's came back.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dhoward Admin Group
 
  
  
 Joined: June 29 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 4447
 | 
          Tony,
           | Posted: April 04 2006 at 18:27 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 Thanks for the update.  I'll look into the code and get it fixed for Incoming Insteon so that you don't have to log to get triggers.
 
 I suspected that the load itself was probably the problem.  Have you talked to SmartHome about this issue to see what their take is?
 
 I assume that this used to work fine with an X10 switch.
 
 Dave.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Thanks Dave.
           | Posted: April 04 2006 at 19:25 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 I posted at CT where SmartHome guys frequent but got no response. Time to move it to them directly.
 
 Yup, an X10 module worked just fine.
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          Ah ha! From SmartHome...
           | Posted: April 07 2006 at 19:06 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 
 
| Quote: 
 
    
    | 
      
       | This is a normal issue that happens when you have a lamp module that has local control turned on, which is the default setting for the insteon LampLinc. To remedy this issue simply set the LampLinc to an X address by putting hte device in linking mode (hold hte set button for 10 seconds) and send the x10 address off command 3 times (for example F5 off F5 off F5 off.) This will disable Local control. Then unlink the x10 address from the LampLinc module by holding the set button for 10 seconds, then hold it again for another 10 seconds and then send the X10 off command 3 more times. |  |  |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | dhoward Admin Group
 
  
  
 Joined: June 29 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 4447
 | 
          Well this is an interesting tidbit...I didnt even know that you could disable local control (it may be in the manual and I missed it).
           | Posted: April 09 2006 at 20:37 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 So what they're saying, is that with certain loads (Halogens in this case), you may need to disable local control on a lamplinc to get rid of some strangeness.
 
 I'll definately have to file this one away.
 
 Thanks for keeping us informed of the resolution.
 
 Dave.
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | cmctague Newbie
 
  
 
 Joined: March 07 2006
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 16
 | 
          So, this may have an obvious answer, but I can't seem to figure out that it is.  How can I send the local control off sequence using power home and a PowerLinc V2 USB controller?
           | Posted: December 08 2006 at 14:42 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 Thanks,
 chuck
 
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | TonyNo Moderator Group
 
  
  
 Joined: December 05 2001
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 2889
 | 
          If you mean so that the switch uses the local ramp rate, Insteon won't let you.
           | Posted: December 08 2006 at 17:00 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  |