Author |
|
krommetje Super User
Joined: December 29 2004 Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline Posts: 695
|
Posted: April 11 2006 at 07:15 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Dave,
would there be a possibility to have the CC or Device-Status-screen to have a window outside PH on a 2nd monitor. I am brewing on making my Server run a multi-monitor setup so that I can have the main PH-screen on the server's main monitor and the cc/device status on the second monitor in a different room.
Peter
|
Back to Top |
|
|
dhoward Admin Group
Joined: June 29 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4447
|
Posted: April 11 2006 at 14:52 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Peter,
PowerHome will be separated into Client and Server sections in a future version. The first thing you will see though is a stand-alone client Control Center that can be run on remote machines.
In the meantime, you can get both remote Device Status and Control Center by using the webserver and Internet Explorer run in fullscreen mode. It works very well and might get you by.
Dave.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
krommetje Super User
Joined: December 29 2004 Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline Posts: 695
|
Posted: April 13 2006 at 05:19 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Quote:
PowerHome will be separated into Client and Server sections in a future version. The first thing you will see though is a stand-alone client Control Center that can be run on remote machines. |
|
|
That sounds good, should I upgrade my PC for this?
Quote:
In the meantime, you can get both remote Device Status and Control Center by using the webserver and Internet Explorer run in fullscreen mode. It works very well and might get you by. |
|
|
the only big disadvantage is that the log becomes so big when every minute the page is refreshed...oh well...
Peter
|
Back to Top |
|
|
dhoward Admin Group
Joined: June 29 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4447
|
Posted: April 16 2006 at 22:39 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Peter,
Shouldnt need to upgrade the PC.
Ive added to the to-do list to separate logging of web events for internal vs external .
Dave.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
TonyNo Moderator Group
Joined: December 05 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 2889
|
Posted: April 17 2006 at 07:27 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I think he was referring to adding the second monitor in preparation (he hasn't yet).
Internal v external as in local network v outside? <he hopes>
|
Back to Top |
|
|
krommetje Super User
Joined: December 29 2004 Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline Posts: 695
|
Posted: April 18 2006 at 09:16 | IP Logged
|
|
|
TonyNo wrote:
I think he was referring to adding the second monitor in preparation (he hasn't yet). |
|
|
that is right: I haven't got the 2nd mon. yet... it was a brainstorm I had..
Peter
|
Back to Top |
|
|
krommetje Super User
Joined: December 29 2004 Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline Posts: 695
|
Posted: April 18 2006 at 09:18 | IP Logged
|
|
|
dhoward wrote:
Shouldnt need to upgrade the PC. |
|
|
Notify me when I should upgrade my PC when the new version demands more power OK...
Quote:
Ive added to the to-do list to separate logging of web events for internal vs external . |
|
|
that is nice...thanx...
|
Back to Top |
|
|
dhoward Admin Group
Joined: June 29 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4447
|
Posted: April 19 2006 at 22:28 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Tony,
Im thinking of making the extra flag for "Trusted IP's" vs non-trusted. If you have to enter a userid/password to access the server then that would be one flag and if you've got trusted IP's (presumably your local network) then that would be a separate flag. Would this be suitable?
Peter,
Will do...did you ever get the DB I emailed you?
Dave.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
TonyNo Moderator Group
Joined: December 05 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 2889
|
Posted: April 19 2006 at 23:16 | IP Logged
|
|
|
If I understand correctly, I think that would be fine. I just don't want to wade through logs containing a ton of web traffic from my local touchscreen, for example.
Maybe allow IP masks/ranges (192.168.x.x or 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.255)?
Edited by TonyNo - April 19 2006 at 23:19
|
Back to Top |
|
|
dhoward Admin Group
Joined: June 29 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4447
|
Posted: April 19 2006 at 23:47 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Tony,
Basically anything that is in the web server configuration "Trusted IP's" section would follow one logging flag (which you could switch off) and everything else using another logging flag.
The "Trusted IP's" section allows you to do ranges using the asterisk such as 192.168.* for your internal network .
Dave.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
TonyNo Moderator Group
Joined: December 05 2001 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 2889
|
Posted: April 20 2006 at 07:32 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Yup. Sounds good!
|
Back to Top |
|
|
krommetje Super User
Joined: December 29 2004 Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline Posts: 695
|
Posted: April 24 2006 at 07:08 | IP Logged
|
|
|
dhoward wrote:
Will do...did you ever get the DB I emailed you?
|
|
|
yep: got it... Thanx, will let you know how things turn out..
Peter
Edited by krommetje - April 24 2006 at 07:08
|
Back to Top |
|
|