Author |
|
jeffw_00 Super User
Joined: June 30 2007
Online Status: Offline Posts: 929
|
Posted: August 22 2009 at 09:38 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi - so in the process of debugging another problem, I was looking through logs and found "Syntax Error" with no other identifying information. I traced it to the few places that I use Command=INSTEON. It gives me a syntax error and then correctly executes the command.
I replaced these uses with Command=FORMULA and then ph_insteon(dev,cmd), and the error went away. So it's not a problem, but thought i should mention.
Anyone else see this? It doesn't affect operation so you'd have to look for it. it could be because these macros were converted from 1.0 (though i tried deleting/replacing the lines and the syntax error stayed around).
/j
|
Back to Top |
|
|
BeachBum Super User
Joined: April 11 2007 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1880
|
Posted: August 22 2009 at 09:48 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Known problem if Formula Error is checked on under Log. False errors with Insteon commands although I did not know the bypass that you discovered.
__________________ Pete - X10 Oldie
|
Back to Top |
|
|
grif091 Super User
Joined: March 26 2008 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1357
|
Posted: August 22 2009 at 12:14 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I think this is the result of the Send Keys/Formula field being evaluated for an Insteon command. That field is blank for an Insteon command leading to the false syntax error message. When you switch to Formula the Send Keys/Formula field has the ph_xxxx command so the false syntax error is not present. I believe Dave has indicated this is fixed in the next release.
__________________ Lee G
|
Back to Top |
|
|